Forensic firearm examiners are crucial in criminal investigations by linking bullets and cartridge cases to specific firearms. However, the validity of this analysis has been increasingly questioned. A recent incident at the Rhode Island crime lab highlighted severe flaws when three examiners incorrectly matched cartridge cases with differing class characteristics, indicating a significant error in basic analysis. This incident reveals deep-seated problems within forensic practices and the reliance on visual confirmation bias, raising concerns about the potential miscarriage of justice due to flawed forensic methods.
This is not just a story of incompetence—the case exposes deeper, systemic flaws in the discipline and how these flaws can jeopardize justice.
The fact that not one but three examiners overlooked such a fundamental discrepancy underscores a deeper problem: systemic issues embedded in the discipline's methods, practices and culture.
Collection
[
|
...
]