Unreliable Biomedicine: A Book Review
Briefly

Csaba Szabo, in his upcoming book 'Unreliable: Bias, Fraud, and the Reproducibility Crisis in Biomedical Research,' explores the issues plaguing biomedical research, including widespread data fraud, cherry-picking, and p-hacking. These "statistical shenaniganry" practices lead to significant discrepancies in findings, raising alarms about the reliability of published studies. Furthermore, he calls for greater oversight and harsher penalties for scientific misconduct, emphasizing the need for integrity in biomedicine, especially as funding for critical research remains uncertain amid political challenges.
"Even with perfectly honest and well-intended analytical intentions," writes the distinguished Hungarian scientist Csaba Szabo, "different groups of scientists, analyzing the same sets of data, can come to completely different conclusions."
As small but meaningful levels of variance can jeopardize each stage of biomedical research, the combined effects of the distortion raise pressing questions about how reliable is the field's foundational research.
To address these systemic issues in biomedicine, Szabo advocates for increased oversight, faster retraction, and significantly higher penalties for those found committing fraud.
Corrupted studies are rampant due to cherry-picking, p-hacking, and other kinds of "statistical shenaniganry."
Read at Psychology Today
[
|
]