'Titus Andronicus,' Shakespeare's earliest tragedy, was written between 1589 and 1593 and premiered in 1594. Initially popular for its violent content, it has since been deemed the least esteemed of his plays. Critics like Dr. Samuel Johnson and T. S. Eliot have condemned its brutality and lack of depth. Despite its low esteem in literary circles, scholars agree that it marked a significant phase in Shakespeare's evolution. Many attribute the play's existence as an emulation of contemporary revenge dramas, emphasizing Shakespeare's early engagement with different genres.
Dr. Samuel Johnson argues that the barbaric violence in 'Titus Andronicus' is so extreme it cannot be tolerated by any audience, reflecting its lasting negative reception.
T. S. Eliot completely dismisses 'Titus Andronicus' as one of the stupidest and most uninspired plays, highlighting the divide in its historic reception.
Modern scholars largely agree on Shakespeare's authorship of 'Titus Andronicus,' arguing that it played a crucial role in his literary development despite its poor reputation.
Harold Bloom posits that 'Titus Andronicus' is significant mainly because it confirmed Shakespeare's authorship, allowing him to purify his style from earlier influences.
Collection
[
|
...
]