Child safety advocates are alarmed by potential amendments to the UK's Online Safety Act amid US-UK trade negotiations. Fears have emerged that child protection could be sacrificed for trade concessions, particularly after the US raised concerns about free speech implications of the legislation. Campaigners, including the Molly Rose Foundation—a charity founded after a teenager's tragic death linked to harmful online content—have urged the government against using child safety as leverage during discussions, emphasizing the necessity of strict protections against online dangers for youth.
Child safety campaigners have warned the government against weakening online laws, stating that compromising on the Online Safety Act would be a grievous betrayal of voters' trust.
The Molly Rose Foundation expressed its dismay at the suggestion of the Online Safety Act being used as a bargaining chip in trade talks, advocating for unwavering commitment to child safety.
Concerns about free speech versus child safety were brought to light after the US State Department challenged the UK's Online Safety Act and its enforcement policies.
Beeban Kidron criticized the Labour party, asserting that their constituents would not support compromises made at the expense of child safety, signaling clear voter sentiments.
Collection
[
|
...
]