The article contrasts two major infrastructure projects in England: the Tyne Bridge restoration, which requires an extra £6 million from the government, and the proposed £6 billion Lower Thames Crossing. While the Tyne Bridge is an iconic landmark in need of investment, the government is reluctant to provide additional funding despite local councils' distress. In stark contrast, the Chancellor champions the Thames Crossing as essential infrastructure. This disparity highlights concerns about governmental prioritization and suggests a growing discontent among communities in less affluent areas feeling overlooked in favor of other projects.
People feel betrayed, when 68m has already been spent on preparatory work and buying land. Labour stalwarts in red wall seats are angry and restless.
While the prime minister recently described the structure as an iconic part of the Newcastle and Gateshead skyline, he refused to offer any assurance that the remaining 6m would be forthcoming.
There’s no such reluctance for the proposed Thames crossing… Rachel Reeves says it represents infrastructure the country desperately needs.
Plans, approved by the last government, have been abandoned because its 500m cost apparently offers poor value for money and limited economic benefits.
Collection
[
|
...
]