The poor don't need Reeves's austerity. And neither does Britain | William Keegan
Briefly

The article critiques Chancellor Rachel Reeves's spring budget approach, which has been characterized by fiscal constraints that prioritize balancing the budget over stimulating the economy. Many in the media viewed her plans as potentially leading to tax increases or spending cuts, which would disproportionately affect vulnerable groups, including the disabled. The writer references Sir Douglas Allen's insights, emphasizing that economic recovery should come before balancing the books. The overall tone expresses deep concern over the inhumane implications of such fiscal policies during a time of near economic stagnation.
Reeves's self-imposed fiscal rules prioritize balancing the budget over supporting an economy on the brink of stagnation, particularly affecting the most vulnerable.
With the British economy close to stagnation, balancing the books through demand cuts is the wrong approach, especially when it impacts vulnerable populations.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
|
]