Opinion | What Judges Can Do for the Rule of Law Under Trump
Briefly

President-elect Trump's threats of incarceration against political adversaries signify a pressing concern regarding the impartiality and integrity of the Justice Department and F.B.I., as pressure mounts over law enforcement under his administration.
Trump's potential influence over the 94 federal district courts raises questions about the independence of these judicial officials, particularly in the context of requiring them to uphold justice against political motivations.
Remarks made by Trump's nominees, particularly Pam Bondi and Kash Patel, indicate a troubling direction where political loyalty supersedes legal fairness, with the creation of an enemies list highlighting a shift towards a politically-driven judiciary.
When district judges are confronted with potentially biased prosecutorial requests, such as eavesdropping warrants, the threat of political pressure may undermine the principle of justice, rendering judges powerless against unwarranted governmental actions.
Read at www.nytimes.com
[
|
]