"The impact of the case even drove Trump to hear today's arguments at the court a first for a sitting president. Trump wants to make the story be about him, but that's not what the story is today the story today is about the constitution and the Bill of Rights."
"When it comes to the matter of birth tourism, which Sauer argues is a key side-effect of unrestricted birthright citizenship, the solicitor general contends that no one knows for sure how significant a problem it is."
The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in the case Trump v Barbara, which addresses the constitutionality of President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship. This marks the first time a sitting president has attended such arguments. Demonstrations are taking place outside the court, with significant public interest in the case. The ACLU is challenging the executive order, emphasizing the constitutional implications. The solicitor general acknowledges uncertainty regarding the extent of birth tourism as a problem, citing various media reports and a congressional report from 2022.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]