Courts in the U.S. are facing a significant increase in legal filings that reference research generated by AI, which often includes inaccuracies and fictitious citations. Attorneys have been penalized for submitting briefs based on AI outputs without proper verification. Since June 2023, there have been 95 documented instances of AI hallucinations in the legal context. These occurrences raise serious concerns about the reliability of AI in legal proceedings, prompting judges to take measures against misleading submissions and highlighting the broader implications for accuracy in professional writing.
Courts across the U.S. are confronting a surge of legal filings that rely on flawed AI-generated research, leading to fines and reprimands for attorneys.
Damien Charlotin found 95 cases of AI hallucinations in U.S. courts since June 2023, with ongoing issues as attorneys increasingly use AI without adequate oversight.
Collection
[
|
...
]