"At issue is the midterm redrawing of New York's 11th congressional district, including Staten Island and a small part of Brooklyn. The district is currently held by a Republican, but on Jan. 21, a state Supreme Court judge ruled that the current district dilutes the power of Black and Latino voters in violation of the state constitution."
"Voters and the State of New York contended it's too soon for the Supreme Court to wade into this dispute. New York's highest state court has not issued a final judgment, so the voters asserted that if the Supreme Court grants relief now 'future stay applicants will see little purpose in waiting for state court rulings before coming to this Court.'"
"GOP Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, who represents the district, and the Republican co-chair of the state Board of Elections promptly appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to block the redrawing as an unconstitutional 'racial gerrymander.' New York's congressional election cycle was set to officially begin Feb. 24, the opening day for candidates to seek placement on the ballot."
The U.S. Supreme Court intervened in New York's redistricting dispute by blocking a state court decision that would have redrawn the 11th congressional district, currently held by Republican Nicole Malliotakis. A state judge had ruled the existing district dilutes Black and Latino voting power in violation of state constitution. Republicans appealed to the Supreme Court, claiming the redrawing constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. New York voters and state officials argued the Supreme Court should not intervene before state courts issued final rulings, warning premature intervention would encourage future applicants to bypass state processes. The unsigned majority opinion provided minimal rationale for the intervention, drawing criticism from three dissenting liberal justices.
Read at www.npr.org
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]