"I am calling on @elonmusk, @finkd, and @tiktok_us to remove the horrifying videos of Charlie Kirk's murder. He has a family, young children, and no one should be forced to relive this tragedy online, wrote Luna. These are not the only graphic videos of horrifying murders circulating at some point, social media begins to desensitize humanity. We must still value life. Please take them down."
"Others, however, criticized the call for censorship. Strongly disagree. There are enough of these videos at this point to infer that they legitimately display the callous, inhumane, and vicious nature of the American left. Censorship is not protecting people. They need to see the truth to understand the evil they are facing. https://t.co/hSlsIpm9Yd Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) September 11, 2025 I strongly disagree. If you hide the truth-you bury it. Charlie wouldn't want that. Let the world see who these terrorists are."
A congresswoman urged major social platforms to remove graphic videos of Charlie Kirk's killing, citing his family, young children, and the harm of forcing repeated exposure. The request framed circulating violent footage as desensitizing and pleaded for platforms to value life by taking the content down. Some public figures supported removal and expressed distress at having seen the footage. Other users rejected removal as censorship, arguing that the videos reveal brutality and should remain accessible to expose perceived political violence. The exchange underscores polarized views on content moderation, trauma, privacy, and public awareness.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]