Donald Trump’s approach to power neglects the concept of soft power, crucially understood by military and diplomatic leaders in history. George C. Marshall exemplified this with the Marshall Plan, securing Western Europe from Soviet influence post-World War II. Similarly, Jim Mattis advocated soft power while serving as secretary of defense, emphasizing the importance of diplomacy over military force. The dismantling of USAID by the Trump administration signifies a notable shift away from these soft power strategies, marking a pivotal moment in how American influence is projected globally.
George C. Marshall's support for the Marshall Plan helped secure Western Europe from Soviet control, using soft power rather than military might, which defined the Cold War's battleground.
Jim Mattis highlighted the significance of fully funding the State Department, equating its neglect to the need for increased military spending, thus advocating for the necessity of soft power.
Soft power, as defined, is obtaining desired outcomes through attraction and persuasion, rather than through coercion and payment, emphasizing the role of diplomacy.
The dismantling of USAID under the Trump administration symbolizes a critical turning point in America's global influence, reflecting a shift away from soft power strategies.
Collection
[
|
...
]