Trump's first judicial nominee, Hermandorfer, is set for a final Senate confirmation vote without prior vetting by the American Bar Association. Firings at the Justice Department and FBI have caused a culture of fear among employees concerned about abrupt terminations. The administration's handling of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia raises uncertainty regarding its commitment to prosecuting a man labeled a 'dangerous illegal alien.' Stanford Law professor Pam Karlan articulates her serious concerns regarding the current state of constitutional affairs, describing it as a period of significant danger.
Trump's first judicial nominee Hermandorfer moves ahead to final confirmation vote in Senate; the president's pick to fill a Sixth Circuit vacancy is headed to a final ballot as the first judicial nominee in years not to have been formally vetted by the American Bar Association.
Widespread, abrupt terminations have left Justice Department and FBI employees wondering if they will be next, people familiar with the matter say in response to firings without explanation at the agencies.
In the case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, the administration appears primarily concerned with ensuring that a man it has described as a 'dangerous illegal alien' never walks free on U.S. soil, raising questions about the clarity of its prosecutorial promise.
A longtime Stanford Law professor and seasoned Supreme Court advocate, Professor Karlan expresses strong views on the current constitutional moment, calling it 'A Period Of Great Constitutional Danger'.
Collection
[
|
...
]