The recently released 64,000 pages of documents regarding JFK's assassination featured no redactions, resulting in the exposure of sensitive personal data, including Social Security numbers of numerous individuals, some still living. Critics argue this suggests a rushed vetting process by the F.B.I., contradicting claims of transparency by the Trump administration. The suddenness of the announcement to release these files caused chaos among national security officials, who scrambled to assess risks. Former contractor William A. Harnage expressed outrage over the impact of the release on innocent parties, contrasting the administration's claims of transparency.
President Trump's announcement to release documents on JFK's assassination exposed personal information of hundreds, raising concerns about government transparency and endangering individuals.
Critics argued that the lack of redactions in the newly released documents was a result of the F.B.I.'s rushed vetting process, compromising safety.
With the release, individuals discovered their Social Security numbers included in files from decades past, prompting outrage over privacy violations amid claims of transparency.
Former government contractor William A. Harnage labeled the leak of his personal information as nearly criminal, highlighting the ethical implications of document release.
Collection
[
|
...
]