Justice Dept. Nominees Suggest Some Court Orders Can Be Ignored
Briefly

During Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, President Trump's nominees for top positions in the Justice Department, including Harmeet K. Dhillon, D. John Sauer, and Aaron Reitz, debated whether the administration could disregard certain court rulings. Reitz referenced Andrew Jackson's historical defiance of a Supreme Court order, suggesting ambiguity in the obligation of public officials to follow judicial commands. This contentious exchange, amid various legal challenges facing the Trump administration, raises serious questions about the limits of presidential power and adherence to the rule of law, particularly regarding government reforms led by Trump.
During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, nominees affiliated with Trump discussed the administration's stance on ignoring some court orders, raising concerns over presidential powers.
Aaron Reitz suggested there are instances when public officials might not be bound by court decisions, reflecting uncertainty about adherence to judicial rulings.
Read at www.nytimes.com
[
|
]