"You know, it's funny. Kimmel is saying it's our guy that shot Charlie. It's probably his guy that shot Charlie. I mean, I don't know if he was a fan of Jimmy Kimmel, but, you know, to go out there and pin assassinations like that falsely when we all know the facts, you can't do that. You can't do that in this country. You can't do it anywhere."
"Right? You know, I've watching some of the liberal networks. I've never heard them care about the constitution so much. Their First Amendment, First Amendment. This has nothing to do with the First Amendment. This has to do with the business decision, as you noted. And for all the concern about the First Amendment, the First Amendment, they're apoplectic. Jesse, what about all the amendments that Charlie Kirk lost? Because Charlie Kirk has no amendments right now. None."
Kayleigh McEnany dismissed First Amendment arguments surrounding Jimmy Kimmel's suspension from ABC and said the action reflected a business decision. McEnany claimed liberal networks suddenly emphasize constitutional concerns while overlooking perceived losses of rights for Charlie Kirk. She stated that Charlie Kirk "has no amendments right now" and called the media reaction to Kimmel hypocritical. Jesse Watters criticized Kimmel for making an allegation linking someone to Charlie's shooting, calling such accusations false and irresponsible. The exchange centered on corporate discipline, perceived partisan double standards, and competing claims about free speech and accountability.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]