The article critiques significant shifts within major law firms and the legal landscape as influenced by political figures like Trump. Milbank's embrace of pro bono work tied to Trump raises ethical concerns about law firms prioritizing profit over principles. Meanwhile, DLA Piper's contradictory stance on diversity policies points to deeper systemic issues. Furthermore, the uptick in law school applications as Trump contemplates a second term raises questions about the rule of law. Lastly, reactions from notable Republican figures signal an internal conflict within the party regarding Trump's approach to law and justice.
Milbank's recent decision to take on high-profile pro bono work associated with Trump highlights a growing trend among law firms prioritizing profit over principle, raising ethical concerns.
DLA Piper's recent policy changes around diversity reveal a troubling double standard; the firm claims to promote inclusion while simultaneously enacting measures that could undermine its diversity efforts.
The spike in law school applications coinciding with Trump's potential second term suggests a growing interest in legal careers, even as concerns around the integrity of the justice system loom large.
Criticism from former officials, like Bush Jr's Attorney General, sheds light on a struggle within the GOP regarding Trump's influence on legal practices, indicating broader ramifications beyond partisan lines.
Collection
[
|
...
]