Supremes consider whether one district judge can derail a president
Briefly

The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments challenging President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship, with potential implications for his presidency and the separation of powers. Critics point to the rise of universal injunctions as a tactic to disrupt executive policies, noting that the current administration has already faced numerous injunctions, a stark contrast to past norms. This trend raises questions about judicial overreach and the ability of courts to intervene in political decisions, with observers anticipating a tight ruling closely tied to Chief Justice Roberts.
The Resistance has made universal injunctions its lawfare weapon of choice to combat Trump II, securing 40 such injunctions in under 4 months.
During his first term, courts hit Trump with more than half of all universal injunctions - 64 of them - entered between 1963 and 2023.
Read at New York Post
[
|
]