The article discusses the dramatic cuts to USAID programs under the Trump Administration, which aims to end nearly 90% of its initiatives, impacting crucial services such as education, health, and humanitarian aid. Critics argue that these cuts jeopardize programs like Gavi, the global vaccine alliance. Moreover, the effectiveness of U.S. aid itself is questioned, recognizing the mixed results over decades, often leading to poverty and inequality. The article highlights the U.S.'s declining monopoly in foreign aid as other nations like China ramp up their contributions, emphasizing a need for re-evaluation of aid strategies.
The Trump Administration is terminating close to nine out of ten USAID programs, affecting vital areas such as health, education, and humanitarian relief.
Cuts to humanitarian relief and public health are particularly worrying; for instance, the U.S. plans to de-fund the global vaccine alliance Gavi, endangering millions.
The outcomes of decades of aid have generally led to enfeebled public services and rising inequality, suggesting the need for a critical review of aid effectiveness.
The misconception about U.S. aid is significant; it consumes about 1% of the federal budget and mostly benefits American contractors rather than those it’s intended to help.
Collection
[
|
...
]