US-Iran nuclear talks: Deal or military strike?
Briefly

US-Iran nuclear talks: Deal or military strike?
"Perhaps even Trump himself does not yet know the definitive answer" regarding US war goals, according to Menashe Amir, an Israel-based Iran expert. He further noted that "Trump has come to the conclusion that the Middle East will never find stability without an end to the current leadership in Tehran," suggesting regime change considerations are gaining traction in Washington policy circles."
"Iran has stated in a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres that it does not want to start a war. However, if the country is attacked militarily, it will respond "resolutely and appropriately" within the framework of its right to self-defense, establishing clear parameters for potential Iranian military response."
"US President Donald Trump is considering limited military strikes against Iran as a first step to exert pressure on Tehran to accept his demands on a nuclear deal, while trying to avoid a spiral of escalation that could lead to all-out war, according to Wall Street Journal reporting."
Tensions escalate ahead of US-Iran nuclear talks scheduled for Thursday in Geneva. Trump administration officials are reportedly considering limited military strikes against Iran as initial pressure tactics, with potential for broader military campaigns targeting Iranian leadership if negotiations fail. Iran has formally stated to the UN that while it does not seek war, it will respond resolutely to any military attack within its self-defense rights. Security experts note uncertainty about ultimate US objectives, though some Washington circles increasingly discuss regime change as a stability goal. Military planning for Iran operations has reportedly reached advanced stages, with multiple strike options under consideration.
Read at www.dw.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]