The article discusses the legal challenges facing President Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship for children of non-permanent residents. Several federal judges have already issued freezes on the order, citing violations of the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. The growing rift between the executive branch and the judiciary has led to discussions of a 'constitutional crisis', as both historians and legal experts examine the implications. It's noted that while disagreements between branches are common, they typically do not result in overt defiance of authority, raising concerns about government accountability and the rule of law.
Several federal judges have already frozen Trump's executive order that would end birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to parents without permanent immigration status.
Historians and legal experts note that when disagreements occur between government branches, they generally do not question or defy each other's authority.
The term 'constitutional crisis' is increasingly used to highlight the seriousness of the tensions between the White House and the judiciary in the current political context.
Ultimately, the Constitution is a promise from the government to the American people on how it will behave and ensures officials act within the law.
Collection
[
|
...
]