"The topic for this article is in reality a sequel to one I wrote about in 2024 (you can read that first installment here). In that article I explained the reasons as to why the Design Process can at times be perceived as a lengthy one, and what factors influence it. I also provided some color to this topic courtesy of some products and engagements I went through in the past that are revelatory of processes that can be labeled "long" and "short"."
"Methodical. Merriam-Webster defines "Methodical" as "habitually proceeding according to method: systematic". Somehow the association that the Design Process is tied with a lengthy set of tasks that requires a considerable amount of time has been imprinted for some professionals in the Technology field, typically those who are more on the periphery and have a very superficial knowledge of what the process actually entails."
Design processes are frequently perceived as lengthy because of misconceptions and limited understanding among peripheral technology professionals. Methodical work means proceeding systematically, combining thoroughness and diligence with intentional structure. Methodical rigor does not equate to wastefulness; methodical teams can remain time-efficient while achieving quality outcomes. Calling processes 'bloated' describes situations where unnecessary steps have accumulated or where stakeholders favor cutting corners. Criticism of process length often reflects a preference for shortcuts rather than objective inefficiency. Effective process design balances systematic methods with pragmatic time management to prevent unnecessary growth while preserving necessary rigor.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]