Wimbledon has introduced AI technology to replace line judges, aiming for perfect accuracy in scoring. This marks a departure from 148 years of human oversight, aligning with practices at the Australian and US Opens. Players have expressed dissatisfaction over the volume of the AI verdicts being too low to hear. Despite the precision of the calls, the absence of line judges creates a sense of loss, highlighting the tension between technological advancement and traditional human roles in the sport. Currently, only the French Open has not adopted this change.
The decision to replace line judges with AI technology marks a significant shift in tennis, as players demand perfection and seek to eliminate human error from their game.
While the accuracy of AI calls is now unmatched, players have found the implementation problematic, with the volume set too low for them to hear the verdicts clearly.
The absence of line judges brings a sense of loss to the iconic feel of Wimbledon, as their roles in the game have been historically significant, providing human connection.
Only the French Open has resisted fully adopting electronic line calling, suggesting a divide among the grand slams in terms of embracing technology over tradition.
Collection
[
|
...
]