When it's illegal to cause distress to believers, call it for what it is: a secular version of blasphemy | Kenan Malik
Briefly

In "Knife: Meditations After an Attempted Murder," Salman Rushdie reflects on his near-fatal knife attack in Chautauqua, New York. He argues that the attack was not directly about his controversial novel, "The Satanic Verses," but rather about the deep-seated symbols associated with it. The assailant, Hadi Matar, expressed superficial familiarity with Rushdie's work, highlighting a broader issue where critics often condemn art without understanding it. Rushdie's ordeal illustrates the power of symbolic interpretations in cultural critiques, echoing contemporary debates over censorship and societal norms in art.
The attack wasn't about The Satanic Verses, insists Salman Rushdie, as he reflects on his near-fatal assault in Chautauqua, New York, in August 2022.
Hadi Matar, the assailant, pleads not guilty, while Rushdie contends the violence stems from symbolically charged misconceptions rather than a direct response to his work.
Rushdie emphasizes that the critics of The Satanic Verses have often not read the book, viewing it instead as a symbol needing denunciation.
The symbolic nature of cultural and artistic debates today reflects broader societal tensions, illustrating how some seek to erase figures or works deemed inappropriate.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
|
]