The article explores the contemporary use of the term 'fascism', emphasizing its frequent misapplication across various political ideologies. It cites John Locke's insight on the fluidity of language, suggesting that clarity in definitions is crucial to avoid confusion. The author introduces historical figures of fascism, like Mussolini, noting that classic fascism inherently rejects peace and views war as a catalyst for nobility and energy within society. By analogizing terms to traffic signs, the article advocates for consistent usage to prevent 'language crashes' in political discourse.
One obvious problem, as noted by John Locke, is that "people can apply sounds to what ideas he thinks fit, and change them as they please." This leads to confusion.
An obvious place to seek the meaning of 'fascism' is to look at what paradigm fascists and fascist thinkers say, as classic fascism rejects peace.
Collection
[
|
...
]