Critical thinking should not be applied to every decision, as many choices do not warrant skepticism. It is effortful and should focus on significant matters. The misconception that skepticism must result in disagreement is incorrect; critical thinking enables agreement or reassessment of ideas. It involves recognizing the limits of one's knowledge and engaging with available information before making a decision. Additionally, skepticism towards expert opinions is not always warranted, as authority and expertise should be appreciated in critical analysis.
A common misconception regarding critical thinking is that one should question everything. Although we should be diligent in our decision-making concerning appropriate scepticism, it's simply the case that applying critical thinking to everything isn't practical.
Critical thinking is effortful and often takes time; therefore, it should be reserved for decisions and topics that matter, those that are important to us.
Part of critical thinking is knowing that you don't know everything, and through critical thinking, you abstain from decisions before engaging all information that is reasonably available to you.
Many perspectives of critical thinking would have you believe that we should be wary of opinions from figures of authority or expertise; this is not necessarily the case.
Collection
[
|
...
]