This essay explores the structure and logic behind analogical arguments, specifically through the lens of ethics concerning abortion and migration. By presenting a formal argument structure with premises and conclusions, the writer establishes a way to assert moral claims based on comparison. The strength of such arguments is contingent upon how well they meet established criteria of similarity. This framework can be used to advocate for or against moral decisions by drawing parallels to known ethical stances, which makes the analogical argument a powerful tool in ethical discussions.
To argue that Y is morally wrong, find an X that is already accepted as being wrong and show how Y is like X.
The strength of an analogical argument depends on three factors; to the degree that an analogy meets these standards, it is a strong argument.
Collection
[
|
...
]