Terrence Malick, the filmmaker, preferred directing over becoming a philosophy professor, driven not by fame or money, but by philosophy's inability to aid in self-understanding. His choice reflects wider trends where promising scholars leave academia, as seen in Martin Woessner's analysis. Malick’s films embody philosophical discussions, suggesting that philosophy can thrive outside academic contexts. His journey illustrates the shortcomings of modern philosophical education, advocating a return to Socratic methods of self-examination and inquiry, as reflected in his own background with figures like Heidegger.
Malick's films and Woessner's study demonstrate it is possible (and sometimes necessary) to philosophize outside of the university's rigid disciplinary boundaries when these questions emerge among our students.
Terrence Malick chose to become a movie director instead of a philosophy professor, not for money and fame, but due to philosophy courses' failure to help him understand himself.
Collection
[
|
...
]