In an interview with Robert Lawrence Kuhn, theoretical physicist David Deutsch emphasizes the critical role of distinguishing between good and bad explanations in knowledge advancement. He describes good explanations as those characterized by unprejudiced thinking, relevance, and specificity, contrasting them with 'bad philosophy' exemplified by logical positivism, which he claims has dominated the intellectual landscape for over a century. Deutsch's framework for understanding explanations seeks to correct this philosophical misstep, promoting a more robust pursuit of ideas and understanding in various fields.
David Deutsch argues that the distinction between good and bad explanations is fundamental for advancing knowledge, emphasizing that good explanations stem from unprejudiced thinking, relevance, and specificity.
In the interview, Deutsch criticizes the influence of 'bad philosophy', particularly logical positivism, suggesting it has hindered the pursuit of meaningful ideas and understanding.
Collection
[
|
...
]