The article discusses the ongoing academic conflict between scientistic beliefs and other disciplines, highlighting that the notion of science as the sole means of understanding has deep historical roots. It features insights from philosopher Massimo Pigliucci, who asserts that science holds supremacy in understanding reality, raising questions about the relevance of fields like philosophy or sociology. The narrative emphasizes the implications of this perspective on the role and significance of non-scientific knowledge and the essential questions that arise within this intellectual war.
So, if we're talking about knowing things about the world as it is, then yeah, science is the only way of knowing. There really is no other way around that.
The gunshot that started the current war is the question: What is there left for the non-sciences to really tell us about the world?
Collection
[
|
...
]