#arxiv tag - Briefly

Ban on Authors Who Submit AI Content "Welcome but Unenforceable"

arXiv will impose a one-year ban for submissions with incontrovertible evidence of incorrect or misleading content generated by large language models, including hallucinated references.

#ai-generated-content

fromComputerworld

1 week ago

Artificial intelligence

Arxiv: Researchers who submit AI-generated junk could get 1-year suspension

fromTNW | Artificial-Intelligence

1 week ago

Intellectual property law

ArXiv introduces one-year ban for researchers who submit papers with unchecked AI-generated content

fromArs Technica

1 week ago

Intellectual property law

Preprint server arXiv will ban submitters of AI-generated hallucinations

Artificial intelligence

fromComputerworld

1 week ago

Arxiv: Researchers who submit AI-generated junk could get 1-year suspension

arXiv will ban researchers for a year for submitting AI-generated articles with obvious errors, fabricated content, or unreviewed AI artifacts.

Intellectual property law

fromTNW | Artificial-Intelligence

1 week ago

ArXiv introduces one-year ban for researchers who submit papers with unchecked AI-generated content

ArXiv will impose a one-year ban for submissions showing clear, unverified AI-generated errors like hallucinated references or leftover chatbot instructions.

Intellectual property law

fromArs Technica

1 week ago

Preprint server arXiv will ban submitters of AI-generated hallucinations

arXiv will ban inappropriate AI-generated submissions for one year and require future work to undergo peer review before hosting.

more#ai-generated-content

Intellectual property law

fromNature

1 week ago

Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban

arXiv bans one year of posting for manuscripts with AI-hallucinated references or other clear generative-AI misuse, and later requires prior peer-reviewed acceptance.

Intellectual property law

fromTechCrunch

1 week ago

Research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work | TechCrunch

ArXiv will ban authors for one year if submissions show incontrovertible evidence they did not verify LLM-generated results.

Science

fromNature

3 months ago

ArXiv says submissions must be in English: are AI translators up for the job?

arXiv requires all submissions to be in English or include a full English translation starting 11 February.

Science

fromNature

6 months ago

Preprint site arXiv is banning computer-science reviews: here's why

arXiv will no longer accept review or position papers in computer science unless the papers have been previously accepted by a peer-reviewed venue.

#arxiv#arxiv

Ban on Authors Who Submit AI Content "Welcome but Unenforceable"

Arxiv: Researchers who submit AI-generated junk could get 1-year suspension

ArXiv introduces one-year ban for researchers who submit papers with unchecked AI-generated content

Preprint server arXiv will ban submitters of AI-generated hallucinations

Arxiv: Researchers who submit AI-generated junk could get 1-year suspension

ArXiv introduces one-year ban for researchers who submit papers with unchecked AI-generated content

Preprint server arXiv will ban submitters of AI-generated hallucinations

Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban

Research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work | TechCrunch

ArXiv says submissions must be in English: are AI translators up for the job?

Preprint site arXiv is banning computer-science reviews: here's why

#arxiv
#arxiv