#judiciary

#judiciary

Justice Joanne Quiñones appointed to the Appellate Term of the Second, Eleventh and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, marking a significant career milestone during Hispanic Heritage Month.

Melissa DuBose makes history as the first Black and out LGBTQ+ judge in Rhode Island's US District Court.

Hon. Suzanne Adams appointed administrative judge for New York County Supreme Court, emphasizing efficiency and diversity in handling civil matters.

The Second Judicial District Equal Justice Committee celebrates Hispanic Heritage Month, recognizing distinguished individuals and emphasizing community contributions and diversity in the legal profession.

The confirmations of Judges Cheeks and Murillo set records for diversity in the U.S. federal judiciary during Biden's presidency.

Trump's potential pardons for January 6 rioters alarm judges and legal observers, fearing it will undermine democracy and the judiciary.

Trump's request for a fourth sentencing delay was denied by the judge, marking another setback in his legal battle over a felony conviction.

Kasie Hunt corrected claims about Judge Tanya Chutkan, emphasizing the distinction between judges and the Justice Department amid discussions on Donald Trump's case.

Trump could solidify a Supreme Court conservative majority by nominating two more justices in a potential second term.

Concerns over transparency in the bankruptcy auction for Infowars prompt judiciary scrutiny.

Judge Merchan's decision to delay Trump's sentencing is seen as prudent, avoiding electoral disruption and potential negative consequences for the judiciary.

Judges may feel entitled to exemption from criticism and accountability, affecting public trust in the judiciary.

Dale E. Ho presides over a landmark case against Mayor Eric Adams, highlighting his legal scholarship and influential background.

Judges invoking civil rights history to defend controversial rulings is a misguided and disingenuous tactic.

Judge Aileen M. Cannon maintains her impartiality amidst scrutiny regarding her prior rulings in favor of former President Trump in separate cases.

Joe Scarborough questions whether Trump will retaliate against judges who debunked his election fraud claims, highlighting the absurdity of such actions.

Trump continues to assert his innocence in legal cases, claiming bias from judges and political motivations behind the charges.

Trump's judicial appointments have significantly shifted the US judiciary towards hard-right conservatism.

The actions of Mitch McConnell in blocking Obama's nominees directly impacted Trump's ability to appoint judges.

Jenna Ellis suggests Trump should focus on the extremity of federal nominees under a Harris administration to engage voters in 2024.

Judge Aileen Cannon exemplifies a troubling culture of entitlement and corruption in the judiciary, revealing a lack of accountability and oversight.

Supreme Court justice Samuel Alito received gifts from a German princess, raising concerns about ethics and transparency in court dealings.

Clarence Thomas faces scrutiny for undisclosed luxury gifts and travel, with the Judicial Conference choosing to avoid action despite clear violations of ethics laws.

Ginny Thomas thanks a right-wing lawyer for efforts against Supreme Court reform, raising ethical concerns about influence and political involvement.

Public trust in the US Supreme Court has collapsed, reflecting a crisis in confidence akin to that seen in authoritarian regimes.

Justice Kagan advocates for an enforcement mechanism to ensure adherence to the Supreme Court's ethics code and bolster public trust in the judiciary.

Trump seeks Supreme Court intervention regarding TikTok, highlighting its ongoing legal and political significance.

The Supreme Court's immunity decision undermines constitutional duties of the president.

The Supreme Court has convened in five buildings across three U.S. cities, showcasing its historical adaptability and resilience.

Banning TikTok risks violating free speech principles in the U.S., aligning it with authoritarian regimes that restrict social media.

The Supreme Court's intervention is critical for the Corporate Transparency Act amid an ongoing legal battle.

Jamie Raskin aims to mobilize Democratic efforts against the Supreme Court through his leadership on judiciary matters.

Texas' challenge in the Supreme Court could redefine First Amendment protections for sexual speech.

Judge Wynn's reversal of retirement prevents Trump from filling the judicial vacancy, illustrating political maneuvering in the judiciary.

Trump's second presidency is poised to continue reshaping the judiciary significantly despite having fewer vacant judicial seats compared to his first term.

Democratic leadership is urging opposition to a bipartisan bill that would create many federal judgeships, fearing it would empower Trump to fill courts with conservatives.

Biden vetoed a bipartisan bill to create federal judgeships, citing unresolved questions and an expedited process by the House.

Concerns about judicial economy and allocation must be addressed before creating new lifetime judgeships.

Vasile Gorghescu was sentenced to life in prison for the premeditated murder of Chaudhary Mahmood, demonstrating extreme violence over a fraudulent scheme.

Former double killer Brian Whitelock, considered low risk, was sentenced to whole-life imprisonment for murdering neighbor Wendy Buckney, amid concerns over his dangerous behavior.

The U.S. judicial panel is taking steps to regulate AI-generated evidence amid growing concerns about its implications in legal proceedings.

The victory underscores the significance of women's rights and free speech in challenging gender biases in the judiciary.

Urgency regarding Russian interference forced Romanian judges to bypass typical procedures, undermining electoral transparency in the name of preserving democracy.

Johnene Stebbins won the Santa Clara County Superior Court judge seat in a contested election, emphasizing commitment to justice and integrity.

The involvement of judges in electoral disputes has increased since Bush v. Gore, threatening democratic norms.

Sen. Whitehouse's investigation unveiled serious shortcomings in the FBI's probe into Kavanaugh, influenced by White House constraints.

Senate Republicans' actions will determine the future of judicial integrity and the extent of Trump's policy impacts.

Judge Carl Nichols expresses concern over potential mass pardons for January 6 rioters, deeming them frustrating and disappointing if granted by Trump.

Two Democratic federal judges decided against taking senior status after Trump won re-election, preventing two vacancies for future nominations.

Court funding delays have severely impacted justice delivery in England and Wales, according to Baroness Sue Carr.

Justice Anna Barbara Hantz Marconi indicted for trying to interfere with a criminal investigation into her husband, emphasizing accountability for all.

Shawn Souza, a former police officer, was convicted of child rape and indecent assault after a jury trial.

A Venezuelan migrant linked to a gang was arrested for robbing a prosecutor, demonstrating a troubling pattern of crime in New York City.

Bernard Lavery was sentenced to 40 months for supplying cocaine, serving half in jail and half under supervised conditions.

Luke Andrews was sentenced to over two years in prison for burglaries at a primary school and a private home.

Italy's government faced setbacks in their asylum processing initiative in Albania, raising doubts about its efficacy and legality.

Italian judges overturned detention orders for seven migrants sent to Albania, blocking the government's outsourcing plan for the second time.

Judicial impartiality must be upheld, even amidst personal relationships; a New Hampshire justice's indictment illustrates the conflict of interest.

The scandal involving former judge David R. Jones and attorney Elizabeth Freeman reveals significant ethical concerns and far-reaching financial implications.

Tina Peters, former elections chief, was sentenced to nine years in prison for election security breaches and deceptive actions relating to the 2020 election.

Judge Barrett criticized Tina Peterson for election tampering, highlighting her betrayal of duty and persistent false claims about election fraud.

A Kentucky sheriff pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder for the fatal shooting of a judge, an incident alarming the local community.

The Second Judicial District Equal Justice Committee honored Hispanic contributions with a ceremony that emphasized community impact and diversity in the legal profession.

A sheriff in Kentucky has been charged with the murder of a district judge, shocking the local community and prompting an extensive investigation.

Former PSNI officer Barbara Gray is pursuing legal advice over attributed comments regarding the judiciary made during the Investigatory Powers Tribunal hearing.

Judicial decisions in Northern Ireland's court system are viewed as 'perverse' due to the influence of the disproportionate number of Catholics.

A judge in suburban Detroit has been suspended following leaked recordings of her making racist and anti-gay comments.

A Michigan judge was removed from her duties after recording revealed her making racist and derogatory remarks.