Comparing the AI code generators
Briefly

In the rapidly evolving landscape of large language models (LLMs), developers are encouraged to utilize a mix of models such as OpenAI's GPT-4.1, Anthropic's Claude 3.7, and others, each bringing unique strengths. While GPT-4.1 excels in UI design and initial scaffolding, it struggles with complex legacy code. Claude 3.7 is noted for its balance of cost and performance but may require vigilance against unsanctioned code modifications. The advancements in these LLMs indicate a significant shift in coding practices, making them valuable tools for developers.
"OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google have each shipped major upgrades this spring, making the experience you had eight weeks ago already out of date."
"When the task is threading a fix through a mature code base, it loses track of long dependency chains and unit-test edge cases."
"Sonnet strikes the best cost-to-latency balance, keeps global project context in its 128k window, and rarely hallucinates library names."
"Sweet spot: Iterative debugging and keeping global context, but be wary of its quick fixes that might overlook critical checks."
Read at InfoWorld
[
|
]