The article discusses the pitfalls of excessive complexity in design systems due to over-engineered token hierarchies. It highlights the problems that arise from having multiple layers of abstraction, inconsistent naming conventions, and too many options, which can lead to confusion and inefficiency among designers and developers. Simplifying the token structure, establishing a clear naming convention, and maintaining a single source of truth are proposed as solutions to improve usability and manageability of design systems.
Introducing excessive layers of abstraction creates unnecessary complexity in design tokens. For effective design systems, it’s vital to minimize these layers for optimal usability and maintenance.
Inconsistent naming conventions lead to confusion, duplicate tokens, and a convoluted update process. Establishing a clear naming protocol is essential for a coherent design system.
Excessive token options create cognitive load for designers and developers, causing decision fatigue. Teams should focus on simplifying and standardizing token choices for enhanced efficiency.
Redundant design tokens result in bloat that complicates system management. Streamlining tokens and adhering to consistent naming can significantly improve a design system's effectiveness.
Collection
[
|
...
]