Intel and AMD's push for high-core processors like granite Rapids and Sierra Forrest promises server consolidation, but reliance on manycore systems carries risks that users should weigh.
Investing in high-core servers can lead to significant cost-saving claims on space and power, yet ignoring these flashy products might actually be the safer approach for many organizations.
A manycore system's potential catastrophic failure due to workload concentration emphasizes the importance of evaluating the trade-offs of power, space savings, and costly RAM in decision-making.
Memory demands for servers with hundreds of cores can lead to expensive configurations that may ultimately result in low utilization rates, contradicting the initially promised efficiency gains.
Collection
[
|
...
]