The concept of learning styles, which suggests individuals learn better with instruction tailored to their preferred sensory modalities, lacks scientific support. Research consistently shows that matching teaching methods to these preferences does not improve learning outcomes. Instead, it can diminish the impact of instructional programs and damage the credibility of Learning and Development (L&D) efforts. Focusing on effective learning strategies grounded in how people actually learn rather than on individual preferences is crucial for enhancing performance and achieving business results.
"The idea of 'learning styles'—that individuals learn better when instruction matches their personal sensory preferences—has been around for decades. But research has repeatedly shown that this approach is unsupported by scientific evidence."
"Even worse, continuing to use it can reduce program impact, waste design time, and chip away at L&D's credibility within the business."
"While people certainly have preferences, adapting instruction to match those preferences has no measurable effect on learning performance."
"Preferred styles don't necessarily reflect cognitive strengths. Matching instruction to a style doesn't improve comprehension or retention."
#learning-styles #learning-and-development #educational-psychology #cognitive-science #instructional-design
Collection
[
|
...
]