Dr. Phil reveals why this Supreme Court case could upend religious freedom
Briefly

The first words of the First Amendment, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion," are often misconstrued to mean total separation of church and state. In a recent Supreme Court case, justices are reconsidering this interpretation, arguing that the Establishment Clause mainly protected states from federal interference in religious matters. Historical perspectives suggest a misunderstanding of the clause's purpose, indicating that states should hold authority over religion, a stance supported by various justices over time, including Joseph Story.
The Supreme Court ruled in 1947 that the Establishment Clause not only limits Congress but also restricts state-level religious actions, contradicting its original purpose.
Justice Joseph Story emphasized that the Establishment Clause aimed to prevent a national ecclesiastical establishment, granting states authority over religious matters.
Read at New York Post
[
|
]