Judge Brian Walsh noted that Schiffer's actions did not rise to the level of witness intimidation or harassment, emphasizing that his speech was protected by the First Amendment. He stated, "nor does his speech, or in this case his written word on fake currency and use of rubber toys, which are afforded the protections of the First Amendment." The judge appreciated the expression of Political Speech over potential intimidation concerns.
Schiffer's attorney, Timothy Bradl, voiced approval of the ruling, suggesting it was a swift and appropriate decision, stating, "Hats off to the judge. He didn't make everyone wait and ruled from the bench. Everything was completely protected by the First Amendment. This was political speech." This underscores the legal boundaries of expressive actions in support of controversial figures.
Collection
[
|
...
]