The court's decision reflects the vilification of dissent in Hong Kong, where the national security law has silenced political opposition and eroded democratic principles.
Legal scholar Benny Tai, described as the mastermind of the operation, argued in vain for a lighter sentence, emphasizing his proposals were not intended to incite action.
Prosecutors claimed the Hong Kong 47 aimed to paralyze the government, pointing to a perceived plan to win majorities and leverage legislative power to topple leadership.
The judges dismissed claims from some activists that the proposed plan would not have worked, asserting that all participants had actively pursued its success.
Collection
[
|
...
]