The prosecution contends that Hassan Sentamu acted without lawful excuse when he brought the knife to the encounter with Elianne Andam, leading to her tragic death.
Sentamu’s defense argues that his autism spectrum disorder clouded his judgment and led to his loss of control during the incident with Elianne's friend.
As the jury begins deliberating the case, the tension surrounding the courtroom reflects the serious implications of this trial, with Elianne's family seeking justice.
The trial postulates critical questions about accountability, mental health, and the consequences of carrying a weapon, all underscoring the tragic events of that day.
Collection
[
|
...
]