The article discusses the controversial decision by Willkie Farr to provide $100 million in pro bono services to conservative clients amid fears of unconstitutional Executive Orders. The decision sparked debate within the firm, with reports indicating not all partners were informed prior to the announcement. Doug Emhoff, who recently joined the firm, expressed disagreement with this decision, wishing to counteract unconstitutional threats instead. Kamala Harris also criticized the silence of organizations in the face of such threats, illustrating a broader concern within Biglaw over complicit actions.
The firm's offer of $100 million in pro bono services to conservative causes sparked controversy, revealing that not all partners were informed prior to the announcement.
Doug Emhoff expressed his disagreement with Willkie Farr's decision to offer pro bono aid, stating he wanted to challenge an unconstitutional executive order but was overruled.
Collection
[
|
...
]