"We Have to Act": Taxpayers Suing Congressmembers for Funding Genocide Speak Out
Federal taxpayers in northern California are suing Congress members over military aid to Israel, claiming it violates constitutional and international laws.
A New History of High Crimes and Misdemeanors
The concept of impeachment has evolved through American history, often focusing on political matters rather than constitutional issues of war.
Judge Cannon tossing Trump's case raises risk for acting prosecutors
Cannon's ruling could threaten the future of special counsels and federal prosecutors serving in temporary roles.
The legitimacy of federally appointed officials may be increasingly challenged following this court decision.
Dear Jurisprudence: Should Joe Biden Just Add the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution?
The Equal Rights Amendment is facing significant legal challenges but remains a crucial issue for guaranteeing sex-based equality in the U.S. Constitution.
Alito and Thomas Have Already Taken the Most-Contradictory Positions of the Supreme Court Term
Justices Alito and Thomas demonstrate a contradictory approach to parental rights in legal judgments regarding gender identity issues.
"Without Prejudice:" Jack Smith Moves to Dismiss the DC Case - emptywheel
The indictment against Donald Trump must be dismissed due to the categorical prohibition on indicting a sitting President.
The Texas Immigration Law Is Doomed
Texas law SB-4, granting state officials immigration law enforcement power, is predicted to fail due to constitutional constraints.
Legal analysis sometimes involves predicting outcomes based on practicality rather than searching for correct answers through case law.
Judge Cannon tossing Trump's case raises risk for acting prosecutors
Cannon's ruling could threaten the future of special counsels and federal prosecutors serving in temporary roles.
The legitimacy of federally appointed officials may be increasingly challenged following this court decision.
Dear Jurisprudence: Should Joe Biden Just Add the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution?
The Equal Rights Amendment is facing significant legal challenges but remains a crucial issue for guaranteeing sex-based equality in the U.S. Constitution.
Alito and Thomas Have Already Taken the Most-Contradictory Positions of the Supreme Court Term
Justices Alito and Thomas demonstrate a contradictory approach to parental rights in legal judgments regarding gender identity issues.
"Without Prejudice:" Jack Smith Moves to Dismiss the DC Case - emptywheel
The indictment against Donald Trump must be dismissed due to the categorical prohibition on indicting a sitting President.
The Texas Immigration Law Is Doomed
Texas law SB-4, granting state officials immigration law enforcement power, is predicted to fail due to constitutional constraints.
Legal analysis sometimes involves predicting outcomes based on practicality rather than searching for correct answers through case law.
TikTok tried to save itself with the First Amendment - and failed
The legal panel's ruling indicates TikTok could face a ban in the US unless ByteDance divests by January 19.
Opinion | Let's Not Bring Back Jail for Swearing
The Supreme Court may reconsider the First Amendment in a way reminiscent of its approach to the Second Amendment, potentially endangering modern free speech rights.
What Conservatives Mean by 'Freedom of Speech'
The perception of free speech is skewed, privileging right-wing expression while disfavoring liberal viewpoints, as evidenced in recent political debates.
Morning Docket: 12.26.24
Arkansas book ban has been deemed unconstitutional, highlighting the necessity of upholding free speech in educational settings.
TikTok tried to save itself with the First Amendment - and failed
The legal panel's ruling indicates TikTok could face a ban in the US unless ByteDance divests by January 19.
Opinion | Let's Not Bring Back Jail for Swearing
The Supreme Court may reconsider the First Amendment in a way reminiscent of its approach to the Second Amendment, potentially endangering modern free speech rights.
What Conservatives Mean by 'Freedom of Speech'
The perception of free speech is skewed, privileging right-wing expression while disfavoring liberal viewpoints, as evidenced in recent political debates.
Morning Docket: 12.26.24
Arkansas book ban has been deemed unconstitutional, highlighting the necessity of upholding free speech in educational settings.
Feldman: The Supreme Court won't save Elon Musk's DOGE plans
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy's plans face significant legal issues, particularly regarding the constitutional limits on presidential power over congressional appropriations.
Transgender Care for Minors Faces Supreme Court Test
Supreme Court to examine Tennessee law on medical care for transgender youth, with implications for constitutional rights.
The law's constitutionality hinges on whether it discriminates based on sex, influencing future legal interpretations of transgender rights.
Trump's Judicial Hero Would Have Hated His Recess Appointments Plan
Trump's proposal to bypass Senate approvals conflicts with Justice Scalia's constitutional principles.
Supreme Court Turns Down Cases on Admissions, Gender Identity and Guns
The Supreme Court is divided on addressing significant constitutional issues regarding admissions, gender identity, and gun control.
SCOTUS Could Outlaw 'Gender-Affirming Care' for Minors Next Year
The Supreme Court will decide if a Tennessee law banning gender-bending medical treatments for minors is constitutional.
US Supreme Court hears arguments on major transgender case
The Supreme Court case on transgender healthcare could set a national precedent regarding discrimination against trans individuals under the Constitution.
Marbury v. Madison
Marbury v. Madison established judicial review, allowing the Supreme Court to void unconstitutional laws and affirming the Constitution as a legal framework.
Transgender Care for Minors Faces Supreme Court Test
Supreme Court to examine Tennessee law on medical care for transgender youth, with implications for constitutional rights.
The law's constitutionality hinges on whether it discriminates based on sex, influencing future legal interpretations of transgender rights.
Trump's Judicial Hero Would Have Hated His Recess Appointments Plan
Trump's proposal to bypass Senate approvals conflicts with Justice Scalia's constitutional principles.
Supreme Court Turns Down Cases on Admissions, Gender Identity and Guns
The Supreme Court is divided on addressing significant constitutional issues regarding admissions, gender identity, and gun control.
SCOTUS Could Outlaw 'Gender-Affirming Care' for Minors Next Year
The Supreme Court will decide if a Tennessee law banning gender-bending medical treatments for minors is constitutional.
US Supreme Court hears arguments on major transgender case
The Supreme Court case on transgender healthcare could set a national precedent regarding discrimination against trans individuals under the Constitution.
Marbury v. Madison
Marbury v. Madison established judicial review, allowing the Supreme Court to void unconstitutional laws and affirming the Constitution as a legal framework.
The ongoing prosecution of Donald Trump has been dismissed based on constitutional grounds prohibiting indictment of a sitting president or president-elect.
A Scary Post-Election Trump Coup Scenario
Donald Trump's plans for contesting a potential electoral loss in 2024 are ambiguous and complicated by legal and political changes since 2020.
Judge further delays Trump hush money sentencing
Trump's 34 criminal convictions have not hindered his presidential re-election campaign.
Why Trump's Talk of Recess Appointments Is Dangerous
Trump's plan for recess appointments threatens constitutional norms and could undermine checks and balances in government.
Judge dismisses classified documents indictment against Trump
A federal judge dismissed the indictment against former President Donald Trump due to an improper appointment of the special counsel, providing a significant win for Trump.
Jonathan Turley Wants Everyone To Chill Out And Just Trust The Guy Who Speaks Fondly Of Hitler
Jonathan Turley downplays claims of Trump's potential authoritarianism, suggesting that the political system remains resilient despite warnings and the events surrounding January 6.
Jack Smith Moves to End January 6 Case
The ongoing prosecution of Donald Trump has been dismissed based on constitutional grounds prohibiting indictment of a sitting president or president-elect.
A Scary Post-Election Trump Coup Scenario
Donald Trump's plans for contesting a potential electoral loss in 2024 are ambiguous and complicated by legal and political changes since 2020.
Judge further delays Trump hush money sentencing
Trump's 34 criminal convictions have not hindered his presidential re-election campaign.
Why Trump's Talk of Recess Appointments Is Dangerous
Trump's plan for recess appointments threatens constitutional norms and could undermine checks and balances in government.
Judge dismisses classified documents indictment against Trump
A federal judge dismissed the indictment against former President Donald Trump due to an improper appointment of the special counsel, providing a significant win for Trump.
Jonathan Turley Wants Everyone To Chill Out And Just Trust The Guy Who Speaks Fondly Of Hitler
Jonathan Turley downplays claims of Trump's potential authoritarianism, suggesting that the political system remains resilient despite warnings and the events surrounding January 6.
Trump Plans to Seize Control of the Budget Via an Obscure Legal Theory
Trump's proposed budget cuts challenge the constitutional separation of powers, asserting presidential authority over appropriations.
His administration advocates for a broad interpretation of executive power in budget management.
How Trump Could Make Congress Go Away for a While
Trump may exploit an untested constitutional provision to bypass Senate confirmation for Cabinet picks, raising serious legal and political concerns.
What Are Recess Appointments' and How Might Trump Try and Leverage Them?
Trump's approach highlights tensions with Senate Republicans and explores the limits of executive power through potential recess appointments.
Raskin Hopes to Lead House Democrats' Resistance to Trump
Raskin challenges Nadler for Judiciary Committee leadership to strengthen Democratic pushback against Trump's authoritarianism and protect constitutional rights.
Conservative Legal Insider Reports Trump Has Bonkers Plan' to Confirm Unpopular Cabinet Picks
Trump has nominated controversial figures for his administration, raising concerns about their confirmation processes.
Trump Plans to Seize Control of the Budget Via an Obscure Legal Theory
Trump's proposed budget cuts challenge the constitutional separation of powers, asserting presidential authority over appropriations.
His administration advocates for a broad interpretation of executive power in budget management.
How Trump Could Make Congress Go Away for a While
Trump may exploit an untested constitutional provision to bypass Senate confirmation for Cabinet picks, raising serious legal and political concerns.
What Are Recess Appointments' and How Might Trump Try and Leverage Them?
Trump's approach highlights tensions with Senate Republicans and explores the limits of executive power through potential recess appointments.
Raskin Hopes to Lead House Democrats' Resistance to Trump
Raskin challenges Nadler for Judiciary Committee leadership to strengthen Democratic pushback against Trump's authoritarianism and protect constitutional rights.
Conservative Legal Insider Reports Trump Has Bonkers Plan' to Confirm Unpopular Cabinet Picks
Trump has nominated controversial figures for his administration, raising concerns about their confirmation processes.
Louisiana Parents Sue to Block Display of Ten Commandments in Schools
The Louisiana state law mandating Ten Commandments in public school classrooms faces legal challenge from parents for being unconstitutional.
The Countdown To Fifth Circuit Mandating Every Student Stare At The 10 Commandments Has Begun
The Louisiana law requiring display of the 10 Commandments in schools was ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge for its religious intent.
Federal Judge Blocks Louisiana Law Requiring Ten Commandments in Classrooms
A federal judge blocked Louisiana's law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, stating it was unconstitutional and coercive to students.
Louisiana Parents Sue to Block Display of Ten Commandments in Schools
The Louisiana state law mandating Ten Commandments in public school classrooms faces legal challenge from parents for being unconstitutional.
The Countdown To Fifth Circuit Mandating Every Student Stare At The 10 Commandments Has Begun
The Louisiana law requiring display of the 10 Commandments in schools was ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge for its religious intent.
Federal Judge Blocks Louisiana Law Requiring Ten Commandments in Classrooms
A federal judge blocked Louisiana's law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, stating it was unconstitutional and coercive to students.
Proposition 1 is criticized as a deceptive measure that could enable non-citizen voting while misleadingly framing itself as a protection for abortion rights.
Justice Miller-Lerman criticized state officials for attempting to overturn voting rights restoration, emphasizing adherence to constitutional law.
NY's Prop 1 opens the door to noncitizen voting
Proposition 1 is criticized as a deceptive measure that could enable non-citizen voting while misleadingly framing itself as a protection for abortion rights.
Mother to challenge law after nine of her 10 children taken into care
The law enabling Tusla to act in suspected child abuse cases may face a constitutional challenge.
The Injustice Of Our Rights Regime - emptywheel
The Constitution protects few rights but maintains strict scrutiny for infringements on protected rights.
Religious leaders push back against conservative Christians who "misuse religion... for hatred" - LGBTQ Nation
Religious leaders in Colorado support a ballot measure to remove the constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, emphasizing the need for protection against potential legal changes.
Judge overturns North Dakota's near-total abortion ban
North Dakota's judge ruled the near-total abortion ban unconstitutional, affirming women's rights and medical freedom before fetal viability.
France to enshrine abortion rights in country's constitution
Enshrining right to abortion in French constitution is a global first with strong public support.
France aims to protect the right to terminate a pregnancy in its basic law, following the US Supreme Court's decision to restrict abortion rights.
French Senate approves a bill to make abortion a constitutional right
France's Senate approved a bill to enshrine a woman's right to abortion in the constitution, following the National Assembly's approval, moving towards final approval.
President Macron aims to make the right to abortion irreversible by amending the constitution, emphasizing women's freedom and responding to global threats to abortion rights.
Judge overturns North Dakota's near-total abortion ban
North Dakota's judge ruled the near-total abortion ban unconstitutional, affirming women's rights and medical freedom before fetal viability.
France to enshrine abortion rights in country's constitution
Enshrining right to abortion in French constitution is a global first with strong public support.
France aims to protect the right to terminate a pregnancy in its basic law, following the US Supreme Court's decision to restrict abortion rights.
French Senate approves a bill to make abortion a constitutional right
France's Senate approved a bill to enshrine a woman's right to abortion in the constitution, following the National Assembly's approval, moving towards final approval.
President Macron aims to make the right to abortion irreversible by amending the constitution, emphasizing women's freedom and responding to global threats to abortion rights.
Teen arrested in first violation of New York county's controversial mask ban
The first arrest under Nassau County's face covering ban raises concerns about the law's applicability and constitutional validity.
Florida is allowed to restrict transgender health care, appeals court rules
The federal appeals court upheld Florida's gender-affirming care ban while litigation proceeds, suggesting the state is likely to prevail in the case.
Amazon Joins Elon Musk's SpaceX In Mission to Destroy Federal Agency Protecting Workers
Amazon argues that the National Labor Relations Board is unconstitutional, citing separation of powers and due process violations.
RFK Jr. will fight getting kicked off NY ballot by claiming it's unconstitutional to make him say where he lives
RFK Jr. appeals ruling that removed him from NY ballots due to a 'sham' address, claiming it's unconstitutional to require residency disclosure.
Judge dismisses attempt to stop Ontario Place redevelopment | CBC News
The legal challenge to stop the Ontario Place redevelopment was dismissed by a judge, allowing the project to proceed.
Can King Charles III and the Royal Family Vote in General Elections?
The U.K. monarchy has symbolic roles but no active political power; royalty can legally vote, but it is not practiced for maintaining political impartiality.
Morning Docket: 05.08.24
Aileen Cannon delays classified documents case due to overwhelming motions.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Invokes The Former Guy' Trump Nickname In Final Leg Of Supreme Court Immunity Hearing
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson referenced 'the former guy' nickname for ex-President Donald Trump during a Supreme Court hearing on presidential immunity.