As budget discussions proceed in Albany, recent polling in New York City highlights flaws in safety-related surveys. Many polls focus solely on 'tough-on-crime' measures, neglecting community-based alternatives. This bias leads to findings that favor punitive solutions. Despite this, evidence shows that programs like crisis respite centers and supportive housing effectively enhance safety and reduce crime rates. The success of community-driven approaches, such as reduced shootings and lower recidivism rates, challenges the prevailing narrative focused on policing and incarceration.
"When polls only ask people how they feel about 'tough-on-crime' solutions, they receive only validation for those very solutions."
"The polling, while flawed, reflects an unfortunate truth: many New Yorkers only hear from their leaders about 'tough-on-crime' policies."
Collection
[
|
...
]