Since its unanimous passage in 1973, the Endangered Species Act (ESA) has transformed from a bipartisan agreement aimed at preserving charismatic species into a contentious legal battleground. Initially, many lawmakers did not grasp its comprehensive implications, believing it would primarily protect large animals. However, the ESA now encompasses thousands of lesser-known endangered and threatened species, leading to widespread legal and community disputes. The rise of environmental law specialists reflects the challenges posed by the ESA as individuals can sue to halt projects threatening these species, which creates friction in development and conservation efforts.
The Endangered Species Act, once a bipartisan success, now faces conflict as communities clash over its implications and legal uses.
Over fifty years, the ESA evolved from a protective measure for charismatic species to a comprehensive law affecting countless lesser-known species.
Initially perceived as protecting only iconic wildlife, the ESA's reach became apparent as thousands of overlooked species gained legal protection.
The ESA allows individuals to sue if projects threaten endangered species, fundamentally altering how development projects are approached.
Collection
[
|
...
]