Cybersecurity frameworks are not effective if they remain inactive and merely decorative. Many organizations erroneously believe they are secure based on compliance with frameworks like NIST or ISO. A critical question that arises is who owns risk in an organization. Governance and risk management should become dynamic, strategic systems rather than static documents. Effective governance requires tailored reporting and ownership of risks which can transform policies into meaningful security measures, yet this is often lacking in current programs.
Cybersecurity isn't failing because we don't have frameworks. It's failing because we keep mistaking frameworks for action. Most organizations think they're secure because they've ticked the right boxes.
Governance and risk management often devolve into disconnected documents instead of living, strategic systems that adapt along with the business. I've encountered significant governance and risk management gaps that need addressing.
Collection
[
|
...
]