The article discusses the multifaceted nature of what constitutes a great university, suggesting that academic evaluation should encompass more than just publication metrics. Academic recognition, societal impact, and student relationships are crucial. While traditional citation metrics like the h-index dominate evaluations, initiatives like the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment advocate for broader measures. The author proposes creating a 'G+ index' to recognize generosity and mentorship in academia, suggesting this could enhance the academic environment and support meaningful development for both researchers and students.
Academics desire recognition and impact, while students seek friendship, emotional growth, and job skills—elements inadequately assessed by traditional publication metrics.
Pressure to publish in high-impact journals compromises scholarly activity, and citation metrics can entrench power imbalances among researchers.
The G+ index could transform academic evaluation by valuing mentorship and other underappreciated behaviors, enhancing the academic experience beyond mere citations.
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment highlights the need for a holistic approach to academic evaluation, moving beyond impact factors and citations.
Collection
[
|
...
]