"The current approach over-indexes on deficit. It tells people what they are not doing. It highlights the shortfall. It rarely shows, in a compelling way, what's within reach if they act now."
"Branding, arguably, sits at the centre of this imbalance. It's still framed too often as an obligation, a distant responsibility, a financial task that competes poorly with immediate priorities."
"Work is more fluid, time is valued differently, and far fewer people see themselves stopping completely at a fixed age. Many are aiming for flexibility rather than a hard stop."
"A more effective approach starts with redefining the outcome. People are not saving for a date. They are saving for control."
Retirement has been consistently marketed, emphasizing the importance of saving and planning. However, the messaging has not evolved with changing behaviors. The current focus on caution and deficits has led to disengagement, as many people do not save enough. The framing of retirement as an obligation competes poorly with immediate priorities. Modern workers seek flexibility rather than a fixed retirement age. A more effective approach would redefine retirement savings as a means to gain control over one's future, rather than merely preparing for a distant endpoint.
Read at London Business News | Londonlovesbusiness.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]