Rep. Daniel Webster's comments on passenger rail during a House meeting sparked debate on the future of Amtrak. He suggested that passenger rail should thrive without heavy government support and focus on competition. However, this stance was challenged by Rep. Seth Moulton, who highlighted the significant federal funding favoring highways over passenger rail. Moulton argued that such discrepancies in funding hinder the development and accessibility of rail services, while the support for Amtrak remains crucial for attracting riders in a predominantly car-driven country. The article critiques Webster's position and emphasizes the need for equitable support across all transportation methods.
Passenger rail works best where demand is high, competition and private sector involvement are ample, and a dependence on government support is low.
Amtrak should serve as an appealing option for travel, not as a replacement for vehicles and airplanes, which remain the overwhelming preference for Americans.
Rep. Seth Moulton pointed out that just since 2008 highways have received more than a quarter of a trillion dollars in Federal support.
Rep. Webster's concept of withdrawing Amtrak support reflects a genuine belief that is not just a throwaway.
Collection
[
|
...
]