The article analyzes the Trump Administration's legal struggles, revealing that it has lost the majority of cases in both federal district courts and circuit courts. With significant cases pending in the Supreme Court, initial signs indicate that the Administration may not fare well. The piece critiques the aggressive legal strategy employed by the Administration, characterizing it as hyper-aggressive and poorly managed, marked by disrespect towards federal judges and an overreliance on emergency claims. This combination of factors highlights not only the weak legal standing of the Administration but also its problematic approach to the judiciary.
The Trump Administration has lost in thirty-six of fifty-six cases in federal district courts and ten of fifteen in circuit courts, indicating poor legal performance.
The Supreme Court’s initial reactions, particularly against Trump's policies on emergency interventions and birthright citizenship, suggest a troubling trend for the Administration.
The Administration's legal strategy is marked by aggression and maximalist arguments, leading to accusations of bad lawyering and ineffective judiciary engagement.
Judges are treated as junior associates rather than impartial decision-makers, showcasing a troubling attitude towards the judicial branch and its authority.
Collection
[
|
...
]