The Supreme Court's 6-3 decision has rolled back previous nationwide injunctions that blocked President Trump's executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship. This ruling is viewed as a significant victory for Trump, who has often criticized judges for obstructing his immigration policies. Justice Sotomayor's dissent pointed out the potential unconstitutionality of the order, suggesting that Trump's approach was strategic rather than lawful. The judgment allows lower courts to determine the extent of injunctions, but questions about the future of birthright citizenship still linger, as highlighted by the Associated Press.
The Supreme Court has rolled back the sweeping injunctions that blocked President Donald Trump's executive order targeting birthright citizenship, seen as a win for Trump.
Sotomayor criticized the Court's decision as allowing a 'gamesmanship' approach that undermines judicial integrity, implying Trump was aware of the order's unconstitutionality.
The Court's 6-3 decision limits nationwide injunctions and stipulates that lower courts can decide on injunction scope for cases challenging Trump's executive order.
Despite the ruling being a victory for Trump, the Associated Press notes that the ultimate fate of birthright citizenship remains unclear.
Collection
[
|
...
]